Go Media recently finished a job for Subscript, the more “boutique” little sister brand of Triple Five Soul. They wanted a blog format so they could post news, pics, and videos and such. The site is pretty minimal. Check it out:
Go there and buy their clothes. Although it might set you back a few bucks, it’s not cheap.













March 13th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
I reaaaaly hate to be the bearer of bad news. But Websites are not your forté from what I have read here. From the use of slices in Drupal, to this with the grey text on the left sidebar in an image file and sliced no less. Among the rest of the layout.
You can mod this if you want. It’s just um. *scratches table*
March 13th, 2008 at 3:16 pm
However These are really cool.
http://www.gomedia.us/web.php
March 15th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
I may have to agree with tripdragon here. The part that got me the most was the grey/white type under the nav that is really hard to read in places and some bad whitespace in some of the content pages.
March 18th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
I work at Go Media and wasn’t a big fan of the low contrast sub navigation either. But knowing the art direction, I’m guessing this was something not entirely under our control. I can tell you having developed websites for about 10 years now, that, although a completely table free layout is quite appealing - many newer developers just have a hard time wrapping their head around CSS, which is the only way to get a really good looking full DIV layout. On top of that, one still often needs a bunch of js or comment hacks to bridge the standards compliance gap between IE and FF. We didn’t do the Drupal tutes in house, actually, we’ve never even launched a site using Drupal. I do encourage full DIV layouts with all css formatting to all our designers.
March 18th, 2008 at 2:31 pm
but yeah, my dudes - if you are going to slice up main nav on that left side there - you should at least have a multi-color rollover!
March 19th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
Brave words Wilson. Thank you for the insight to the reasons for the creation of the site.
As for the designer just brushing css off due to not enough knowledge of it to point that it is bypassed for tables just because. Umm, well…. Lets say that excuse would not fly in other places.